References

Baker M. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature [Internet]. 2016 May 26 [cited 2025 Jul 10];533(7604):452–4. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/533452a

Botvinik-Nezer R, Holzmeister F, Camerer CF, Dreber A, Huber J, Johannesson M, et al. Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams. Nature [Internet]. 2020 Jun 4 [cited 2025 Jul 10];582(7810):84–8. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2314-9

Bowring A, Maumet C, Nichols TE. Exploring the impact of analysis software on task fMRI results. Human Brain Mapping [Internet]. 2019 Aug [cited 2025 Jul 22];40(11):3362–84. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.24603

Cobey KD, Ebrahimzadeh S, Page MJ, Thibault RT, Nguyen PY, Abu-Dalfa F, et al. Biomedical researchers’ perspectives on the reproducibility of research. Lino De Oliveira C, editor. PLoS Biol [Internet]. 2024 Nov 5 [cited 2025 Aug 13];22(11):e3002870. Available from: https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002870

Committee on Reproducibility and Replicability in Science, Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences, Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board, Division on Earth and Life Studies, et al. Reproducibility and Replicability in Science [Internet]. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2019 [cited 2025 Jul 22]. Available from: https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25303

Courtès L, Wurmus R. Reproducible and User-Controlled Software Environments in HPC with Guix. In: 2nd International Workshop on Reproducibility in Parallel Computing (RepPar) [Internet]. Vienne, Austria; 2015. Available from: https://inria.hal.science/hal-01161771

Courtès L. Back to the future: modules for Guix packages [Internet]. Guix-HPC. 2022. Available from: https://hpc.guix.info/blog/2022/05/back-to-the-future-modules-for-guix-packages/

Courtès L, Felšöci M, Hinsen K, Swartvagher P. A guide to reproducible research papers [Internet]. Guix-HPC. 2023. Available from: https://hpc.guix.info/blog/2023/06/a-guide-to-reproducible-research-papers/

Courtès L, Sample T, Zacchiroli S, Tournier S. Source Code Archiving to the Rescue of Reproducible Deployment. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Reproducibility and Replicability [Internet]. Rennes France: ACM; 2024 [cited 2025 Aug 11]. p. 36–45. Available from: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3641525.3663622

10.

Courtès L. Adventures on the quest for long-term reproducible deployment [Internet]. Guix. 2024. Available from: https://guix.gnu.org/blog/2024/adventures-on-the-quest-for-long-term-reproducible-deployment/

11.

Drummond C. Replicability is not reproducibility: nor is it good science. In Collection / Collection : NRC Publications Archive / Archives des publications du CNRC; 2009. (Evaluation Methods for Machine Learning Workshop, the 26th ICML, June 14-18, 2009, Montreal, Canada).

12.

Fang FC, Steen RG, Casadevall A. Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA [Internet]. 2012 Oct 16 [cited 2025 Aug 11];109(42):17028–33. Available from: https://pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1212247109

13.

Felšöci M. Café Guix, commandes guix time-machine et guix describe [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://felsoci.sk/blog/cafe-guix-presentation-des-commandes-guix-time-machine-et-guix-describe.html

14.

Freedman LP, Cockburn IM, Simcoe TS. The Economics of Reproducibility in Preclinical Research. PLoS Biol [Internet]. 2015 Jun 9 [cited 2025 Aug 11];13(6):e1002165. Available from: https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002165

15.

Gau R, Kaczmarzyk J, Ghosh S, Bollmann S, Halchenko Y, Goncalves M, et al. ReproNim/neurodocker: 2.0.0 [Internet]. Zenodo; 2025. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14957539

16.

Glatard T, Lewis LB, Ferreira Da Silva R, Adalat R, Beck N, Lepage C, et al. Reproducibility of neuroimaging analyses across operating systems. Front Neuroinform [Internet]. 2015 Apr 24 [cited 2025 Jul 22];9. Available from: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fninf.2015.00012/abstract

17.

Glatard T, Kiar G, Aumentado-Armstrong T, Beck N, Bellec P, Bernard R, et al. Boutiques: a flexible framework to integrate command-line applications in computing platforms. GigaScience [Internet]. 2018 May 1 [cited 2025 Jul 22];7(5). Available from: https://academic.oup.com/gigascience/article/doi/10.1093/gigascience/giy016/4951979

18.

Goble C. Better Software, Better Research. IEEE Internet Comput [Internet]. 2014 Sep [cited 2025 Sep 3];18(5):4–8. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6886129/

19.

Gorgolewski KJ, Alfaro-Almagro F, Auer T, Bellec P, Capotă M, Chakravarty MM, et al. BIDS apps: Improving ease of use, accessibility, and reproducibility of neuroimaging data analysis methods. Schneidman D, editor. PLoS Comput Biol [Internet]. 2017 Mar 9 [cited 2025 Jul 22];13(3):e1005209. Available from: https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005209

20.

Gundersen OE. The Fundamental Principles of Reproducibility. Phil Trans R Soc A [Internet]. 2021 May 17 [cited 2025 Aug 11];379(2197):20200210. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.10098

21.

Hinsen K. Why computational reproducibility matters [Internet]. Konrad Hinsen’s blog. 2025 [cited 2025 Jun 21]. Available from: https://blog.khinsen.net/posts/2025/06/20/computational-reproducibility.html

22.

Ioannidis JPA. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. PLoS Med [Internet]. 2005 Aug 30 [cited 2025 Aug 11];2(8):e124. Available from: https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

23.

Kennedy DN, Abraham SA, Bates JF, Crowley A, Ghosh S, Gillespie T, et al. Everything Matters: The ReproNim Perspective on Reproducible Neuroimaging. Front Neuroinform [Internet]. 2019 Feb 7 [cited 2025 Jul 23];13. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fninf.2019.00001/full

24.

Nieuwenhuizen J, Courtès L. The Full-Source Bootstrap: Building from source all the way down [Internet]. Guix. 2023. Available from: https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2023/the-full-source-bootstrap-building-from-source-all-the-way-down/

25.

Renard F, Guedria S, Palma ND, Vuillerme N. Variability and reproducibility in deep learning for medical image segmentation. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2020 Aug 13 [cited 2025 Jul 22];10(1). Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-69920-0

26.

Renton AI, Dao TT, Johnstone T, Civier O, Sullivan RP, White DJ, et al. Neurodesk: an accessible, flexible and portable data analysis environment for reproducible neuroimaging. Nat Methods [Internet]. 2024 May [cited 2025 Jul 22];21(5):804–8. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-023-02145-x

27.

Sayre F, Riegelman A. The reproducibility crisis and academic libraries. College & Research Libraries [Internet]. 2018;79(1):2. Available from: https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/view/16846

28.

Stodden V, Leisch F, Peng RD, editors. Implementing Reproducible Research [Internet]. 1st ed. Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2018 [cited 2025 Aug 11]. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315362762

29.

Suda A. Bit-for-bit reproducible builds with Dockerfile [Internet]. 2023 Feb 4. Available from: https://archive.fosdem.org/2023/schedule/event/container_reproducible_dockerfile/

30.

Timpka T. The “enshittification” of online information services obligates rigorous management of scientific journals. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport [Internet]. 2024 Oct [cited 2025 Aug 13];27(10):665–6. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1440244024004936

31.

Tournier S. Reproducible computational environment, when? [Internet]. 2024 Nov 26. Available from: https://hpc.guix.info/static/doc/caf%C3%A9-guix/tournier-20241126.pdf

32.

Tournier S. Guix: a factory for containers? [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://simon.tournier.info/posts/2024-12-11-jres-guix-container-factory.html

33.

Vallet N, Michonneau D, Tournier S. Toward practical transparent verifiable and long-term reproducible research using Guix. Sci Data [Internet]. 2022 Oct 4 [cited 2024 Sep 9];9(1):597. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-022-01720-9

34.

Van Noorden R. More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 — a new record. Nature [Internet]. 2023 Dec 21 [cited 2025 Aug 11];624(7992):479–81. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03974-8

35.

Vila G, Medernach E, Gonzalez Pepe I, Bonnet A, Chatelain Y, Sdika M, et al. The Impact of Hardware Variability on Applications Packaged with Docker and Guix: a Case Study in Neuroimaging. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Reproducibility and Replicability [Internet]. Rennes France: ACM; 2024 [cited 2024 Sep 9]. p. 75–84. Available from: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3641525.3663626

36.

Wen J, Thibeau-Sutre E, Diaz-Melo M, Samper-González J, Routier A, Bottani S, et al. Convolutional neural networks for classification of Alzheimer’s disease: Overview and reproducible evaluation. Medical Image Analysis [Internet]. 2020 Jul [cited 2025 Jul 24];63:101694. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1361841520300591